[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160630094123.GA29268@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 11:41:23 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, arnd@...db.de,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] [v3] System Calls for Memory Protection Keys
* Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net> wrote:
> Are there any concerns with merging these into the x86 tree so
> that they go upstream for 4.8? The updates here are pretty
> minor.
> include/linux/pkeys.h | 39 +-
> include/uapi/asm-generic/mman-common.h | 5 +
> include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h | 12 +-
> mm/mprotect.c | 134 +-
So I'd love to have some high level MM review & ack for these syscall ABI
extensions.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists