[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160630130458.GF30154@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 15:04:58 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, npiggin@...e.de,
walken@...gle.com, ak@...e.de, tglx@...elltoy.tec.linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [RFC 08/12] lockdep: Apply crossrelease to PG_locked lock
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 01:55:23PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> @@ -215,6 +219,11 @@ struct page {
> #ifdef LAST_CPUPID_NOT_IN_PAGE_FLAGS
> int _last_cpupid;
> #endif
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP_PAGELOCK
> + struct lockdep_map map;
> + struct cross_lock xlock;
> +#endif
> }
So that's 32+64=96 bytes (CONFIG_LOCK_STAT=n) added to struct page,
really!?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists