linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/5] perf tests: Fix thread map test for -F option

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 30 Jun 2016 08:27:22 -0500
From:	Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@...il.com>
To:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] perf tests: Fix thread map test for -F option

On 29 June 2016 at 11:06, Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@...il.com> wrote:
> On 28 June 2016 at 06:29, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org> wrote:
>> I hit a bug when running test suite without forking
>> each test (-F option):
>>
>>   $ perf test -Fv
>>   ...
>>   34: Test thread map                                          :
>>   --- start ---
>>   FAILED tests/thread-map.c:24 wrong comm
>>   ---- end ----
>>   Test thread map: FAILED!
>>
>> The reason was the process name wasn't 'perf' as expected
>> by the test, because other tests set the name as well.
>>
>> Setting it explicitly now.
>>
>> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-bqapag0ljaiwmb7hlkw09zk5@git.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
>
>
> This patch also seems fine.  Again, I confirmed that test 34 fails
> without the patch and that this patch fixed it.
>

Tested-by: Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@...il.com>