[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160701102936.GE4593@pd.tnic>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2016 12:29:36 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, Franck Bui <fbui@...e.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 1/2] ratelimit: Extend to print suppressed messages
on release
On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 12:17:43PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Yeah, indeed, you are right.
How about this though, still:
ratelimit_state_exit:
if (rs->missed)
printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: %d output lines suppressed due to ratelimiting\n",
current->comm, rs->missed);
I still think it is better than the "callbacks" thing as we're issuing
it on release and there's not really a @func which callbacks we're
limiting...
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists