linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -v2 1/2] ratelimit: Extend to print suppressed messages on release

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 1 Jul 2016 12:29:36 +0200
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Uwe Kleine-König 
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, Franck Bui <fbui@...e.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 1/2] ratelimit: Extend to print suppressed messages
 on release

On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 12:17:43PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Yeah, indeed, you are right.

How about this though, still:

ratelimit_state_exit:

        if (rs->missed)
                printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: %d output lines suppressed due to ratelimiting\n",
                       current->comm, rs->missed);


I still think it is better than the "callbacks" thing as we're issuing
it on release and there's not really a @func which callbacks we're
limiting...

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.