linux-kernel - Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 3/4] ASoC: mediatek: add BT implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 5 Jul 2016 16:59:15 +0800
From:	Garlic Tseng <garlic.tseng@...iatek.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC:	<tiwai@...e.de>, <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>,
	<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
	<koro.chen@...iatek.com>, <PC.Liao@...iatek.com>,
	<ir.lian@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 3/4] ASoC: mediatek: add BT implementation

On Tue, 2016-07-05 at 10:12 +0200, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 09:52:13AM +0800, Garlic Tseng wrote:
> > On Mon, 2016-07-04 at 16:44 +0200, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > > We really shouldn't be writing the registers or other internal data of
> > > the device.  Instead we should be getting the driver for the relevant
> > > hardware component to do it.  If we just write to registers that makes
> > > the interoperation with the real driver for the device more fragile than
> > > it should be, people might update the main driver without noticing the
> > > external driver.
> 
> > The AUDIO_TOP_CON4 is a reg of the ASoC hw module. All the registers
> > which are set in the btmrg operator belong to ASoC hardware. The reg
> > writing you mention above is to power up the MRG interface in the ASoC
> > module.
> 
> The problem is that this is the machine driver, not a driver for the
> chip that's being controlled.

The patch is for platform driver "mt2701-afe-pcm.c", which contorls the
ASoC module, not for machine driver. Maybe the patch sequence is
confusing and I'm sorry about that. Or did I misunderstand your comment?