[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e9e9933c-c1dd-2e77-fd85-c1c2ff0db885@leemhuis.info>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 20:43:35 +0200
From: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org>
Cc: Quinn Tran <quinn.tran@...gic.com>,
Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux SCSI List <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Reported regressions for 4.7 as of Sunday, 2016-06-19
On 05.07.2016 19:32, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Quinn Tran <quinn.tran@...gic.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> - if (rsp->msix->cpuid != smp_processor_id()) {
>>> + if (rsp->msix && (rsp->msix->cpuid != smp_processor_id())) {
>>
>> Did this wind up going into an official commit somewhere?
> It's not in my tree, at least.
> And I don't think I've seen a "yes, that fixes it".
Quinn Tran ACKed a nearly identical patch from Bruno Prémont in a
different thread:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2257008/focus=2257139
>From what I can see in the initial mail in that thread it seems Bruno
successfully tested the patch he submitted. But I have no idea if the
patch is in someones queue to mainline right now. That's why I had it on
my "if nothing happens soon, poke someone" list...
HTH, CU, Thorsten
Powered by blists - more mailing lists