linux-kernel - Re: Reported regressions for 4.7 as of Sunday, 2016-06-19

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <yq1mvlvq3fo.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net>
Date:	Tue, 05 Jul 2016 15:40:11 -0400
From:	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org>,
	Quinn Tran <quinn.tran@...gic.com>,
	Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
	Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux SCSI List <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Reported regressions for 4.7 as of Sunday, 2016-06-19

>>>>> "Linus" == Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> writes:

Linus> It's not in my tree, at least.

Not in scsi-fixes either. I have been waiting for a "real" patch
submission with one or more Tested-by: tags. I generally don't queue
something that comes with a "try this untested workaround" patch
description.

Quinn, please submit a real patch.

Linus> And I don't think I've seen a "yes, that fixes it". Although
Linus> Johannes was right that in addition to that, the ordering of the
Linus> irq setup should probably _also_ be fixed, but that's a separate
Linus> patch.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering