[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1467823249.8360.28.camel@perches.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2016 09:40:49 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...inux.com, vinod.koul@...el.com, patrice.chotard@...com,
bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, ohad@...ery.com
Cc: lee.jones@...aro.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/18] Add support for FDMA DMA controller and slim
core rproc found on STi chipsets
On Wed, 2016-07-06 at 09:54 +0100, Peter Griffin wrote:
> This patchset adds support for the Flexible Direct Memory Access (FDMA) core
> found on STi chipsets from STMicroelectronics. The FDMA is a slim core CPU
> with a dedicated firmware. It is a general purpose DMA controller supporting
> 16 independent channels and data can be moved from memory to memory or between
> memory and paced latency critical real time targets.
[]
> include/linux/remoteproc/st_slim_rproc.h | 53 ++
Is this directory really necessary?
Why shouldn't this file be local to drivers/remoteproc/?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists