[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <146794221378.73491.2803164814485320331@resonance>
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2016 18:43:33 -0700
From: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
"Gabriel Fernandez" <gabriel.fernandez@...aro.org>
Cc: "Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"Ian Campbell" <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
"Kumar Gala" <galak@...eaurora.org>,
"Srinivas Kandagatla" <srinivas.kandagatla@...il.com>,
"Maxime Coquelin" <maxime.coquelin@...com>,
"Patrice Chotard" <patrice.chotard@...com>,
"Russell King" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"Stephen Boyd" <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
"Olivier Bideau" <olivier.bideau@...com>,
"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
"Sebastian Hesselbarth" <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
"Andrzej Hajda" <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
"Pankaj Dev" <pankaj.dev@...com>,
"Dinh Nguyen" <dinguyen@...nsource.altera.com>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>,
"Thierry Reding" <treding@...dia.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
kernel@...inux.com, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
"Lee Jones" <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
"Peter Griffin" <peter.griffin@...aro.org>,
arnaud.pouliquen@...com, benjamin.gaignard@...com,
vincent.abriou@...com, gabriel.fernandez@...com
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 02/13] drivers: clk: st: Simplify clock binding of
STiH4xx platforms
Quoting Rob Herring (2016-06-19 08:04:58)
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:20:22AM +0200, Gabriel Fernandez wrote:
> > This patch reworks the clock binding to avoid too much detail in DT.
> > Now we have only compatible string per type of clock
> > (remark from Rob https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/25/492)
> >
>
> I have no idea what the clock trees and clock controller in these chips
> look like, so it's hard to say if the changes here are good. It still
> looks like things are somewhat fine grained clocks in DT. I'll leave
> it up to the platform maintainers to decide...
Is this series breaking ABI? If yes, why not do what Maxime did for the
Allwinner/sunxi clocks and just fully convert over to a
one-node-per-clock-controller binding? This one-node-per-clock stuff is
pretty unfortunate, and if we're deprecating platforms (patch #1) then
now might be a good time to re-evaluate the whole thing.
Regards,
Mike
>
> > Signed-off-by: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@...aro.org>
> > ---
> > .../devicetree/bindings/clock/st/st,clkgen-mux.txt | 2 +-
> > .../devicetree/bindings/clock/st/st,clkgen-pll.txt | 11 ++--
> > .../devicetree/bindings/clock/st/st,clkgen.txt | 2 +-
> > .../devicetree/bindings/clock/st/st,quadfs.txt | 6 +--
> > drivers/clk/st/clkgen-fsyn.c | 41 ++++++--------
> > drivers/clk/st/clkgen-mux.c | 28 ++++------
> > drivers/clk/st/clkgen-pll.c | 62 ++++++++++------------
> > 7 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/st/st,clkgen-mux.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/st/st,clkgen-mux.txt
> > index 4d277d6..9a46cb1d7 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/st/st,clkgen-mux.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/st/st,clkgen-mux.txt
> > @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ This binding uses the common clock binding[1].
> > Required properties:
> >
> > - compatible : shall be:
> > - "st,stih407-clkgen-a9-mux", "st,clkgen-mux"
> > + "st,stih407-clkgen-a9-mux"
> >
> > - #clock-cells : from common clock binding; shall be set to 0.
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/st/st,clkgen-pll.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/st/st,clkgen-pll.txt
> > index c9fd674..be0b043 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/st/st,clkgen-pll.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/st/st,clkgen-pll.txt
> > @@ -9,11 +9,10 @@ Base address is located to the parent node. See clock binding[2]
> > Required properties:
> >
> > - compatible : shall be:
> > - "st,stih407-plls-c32-a0", "st,clkgen-plls-c32"
> > - "st,stih407-plls-c32-a9", "st,clkgen-plls-c32"
> > - "sst,plls-c32-cx_0", "st,clkgen-plls-c32"
> > - "sst,plls-c32-cx_1", "st,clkgen-plls-c32"
> > - "st,stih418-plls-c28-a9", "st,clkgen-plls-c32"
>
> > + "st,clkgen-pll0"
> > + "st,clkgen-pll0"
>
> Repeated. Supposed to be 0 and 1? This seems a bit generic, too.
>
> > + "st,stih407-clkgen-plla9"
> > + "st,stih418-clkgen-plla9"
Powered by blists - more mailing lists