lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 8 Jul 2016 17:47:05 +0200
From:	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:	Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>,
	Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
	Yunhong Jiang <yunhong.jiang@...el.com>,
	Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
	Haozhong Zhang <haozhong.zhang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] KVM: nVMX: Fix preemption timer bit set in vmcs02
 even if L1 doesn't enable it



On 08/07/2016 16:08, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> 2016-07-08 21:58 GMT+08:00 Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>:
>> We can't get preemption timer vmexit which vmcs02 is loaded since
>> preemtion timer bit in vmcs02 is not set, then how can we get the
>> incorrect preemption timer vmexit in nested guest which patch 1 fixed?
>> Because the scenario I mentioned in patch 2 set vmcs02.
>>
>> w/o patch1 + w/o enable "L1 TSC deadline timer to trigger while L2 is
>> running"  => we will get the bug calltrace mentioned in patch1 since
>> incorrect vmcs02 bit is set due to the bug mentioned in patch 2. So
>> apply patch2 can fix it.
>>
>> However, after enable "L1 TSC deadline timer to trigger while L2 is
>> running", we should have patch 1 to correctly capture nested vmexit
>> for preemption timer.
>>
>> My setup is L0 and L1 both are latest kvm queue branch w/ Yunhong's
>> preemption timer enable patches and my previous "fix missed
>> cancellation of TSC deadline timer" patches. I always enable
>> preemption timer in L0, but try to enable or disable preemption timer
>> in L1.
> 
> Btw, my L1 is a full dynticks guest in order that hrtimer in L1 will
> be heavily used.

Thanks---I'd be grateful if you tested my patch series.

Paolo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ