linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mtd: Replace if and BUG with BUG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160710015244.GB7547@localhost>
Date:	Sat, 9 Jul 2016 18:52:44 -0700
From:	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
To:	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Cc:	Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...guardiasur.com.ar>,
	Amitoj Kaur Chawla <amitoj1606@...il.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: Replace if and BUG with BUG_ON

Hi,

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 07:41:23AM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Mon, 30 May 2016, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> > On 28 May 2016 at 13:41, Amitoj Kaur Chawla <amitoj1606@...il.com> wrote:
> > > Replace if condition and BUG() with a BUG_ON having the conditional
> > > expression of the if statement as argument.
[...]

> > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ssfdc.c b/drivers/mtd/ssfdc.c
> > > index daf82ba..41b13d1 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/mtd/ssfdc.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/mtd/ssfdc.c
> > > @@ -380,8 +380,7 @@ static int ssfdcr_readsect(struct mtd_blktrans_dev *dev,
> > >                 " block_addr=%d\n", logic_sect_no, sectors_per_block, offset,
> > >                 block_address);
> > >
> > > -       if (block_address >= ssfdc->map_len)
> > > -               BUG();
> > > +       BUG_ON(block_address >= ssfdc->map_len);
> > >
> > 
> > I don't want to be rude, but I wonder if there's any value at all in
> > such a patch. It barely improves readability, it barely reduces the
> > LoC, yet it consumes developer time, maintainer time, and changes git
> > per-line authorship (used in git blame).
> 
> Actually, I think that this particular patch does improve readability a 
> bit.  Scanning straight down the code is easier than looking under an if.
> Also, git blame now has a way to go back in history (although I don't 
> remember what it is), so the argument that cleaning up the code makes it 
> very difficult to find why the nontrivial part of the code is as it is 
> doesn't completely hold any more.

I agree it's a small improvement. Not sure I'd worry too much about
git-blame. Applied to l2-mtd.git.

Brian