[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160711092024.6cbd1c88@bbrezillon>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 09:20:24 +0200
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Milo Kim <milo.kim@...com>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...gle.com>,
Caesar Wang <wxt@...k-chips.com>,
Stephen Barber <smbarber@...omium.org>,
Ajit Pal Singh <ajitpal.singh@...com>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...il.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@...com>,
Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@...com>, kernel@...inux.com,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 12/14] regulator: pwm: Retrieve correct voltage
On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 09:02:51 +0200
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 09, 2016 at 11:47:18AM +0200, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 05:43:02PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> >
> > > Mark, do you want me to provide a stable branch with the PWM regulator
> > > patches and resolve that conflict in your tree? Or would you rather take
> > > the whole set based on a stable branch from the PWM tree? Or maybe yet
> > > another possibility would be to base the PWM tree on a stable branch
> > > from the regulator tree containing the above commit.
> >
> > Probably easiest to use this signed tag and resolve it in your tree:
> >
> > The following changes since commit 1a695a905c18548062509178b98bc91e67510864:
> >
> > Linux 4.7-rc1 (2016-05-29 09:29:24 -0700)
> >
> > are available in the git repository at:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git tags/pwm-modernization
> >
> > for you to fetch changes up to c2588393e6315ab68207323d37d2a73713d6bc81:
> >
> > regulator: pwm: Fix regulator ramp delay for continuous mode (2016-07-07 11:45:06 +0200)
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > regulator: Provide a branch for moderninzation of the PWM code
> >
> > There's a new, improved PWM API which allows a lot of improvements in
> > the PWM regulator driver. Since the bulk of the changes are in the PWM
> > API this is being managed in the PWM tree, merge pending regulator API
> > changes to allow this to be resolved more easily.
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > Alexandre Courbot (1):
> > regulator: pwm: Support for enable GPIO
> >
> > Boris Brezillon (1):
> > regulator: pwm: Drop unneeded pwm_enable() call
> >
> > Douglas Anderson (1):
> > regulator: pwm: Fix regulator ramp delay for continuous mode
> >
> > .../bindings/regulator/pwm-regulator.txt | 7 +++-
> > drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++----
> > 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> Merged into for-4.8/regulator of the PWM tree and rebased Boris'
> pwm-regulator patches on top.
>
> Boris, everything looks right to me, but can you take a quick look to
> see if it all matches up with what you expect?
It looks good, but I won't be able to test it on real hardware until
next week.
Heiko, Brian, can you try this pwm/for-4.8/regulator branch?
Thanks,
Boris
Powered by blists - more mailing lists