linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 12/14] regulator: pwm: Retrieve correct voltage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAD=FV=WoUi4kNHW1h6XCezJyYUXbWLXj3yPYg+W-qhMAjpPn4A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 11 Jul 2016 09:53:12 -0700
From:	Doug Anderson <dianders@...gle.com>
To:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
	linux-pwm <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
	"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Milo Kim <milo.kim@...com>, Caesar Wang <wxt@...k-chips.com>,
	Stephen Barber <smbarber@...omium.org>,
	Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
	Ajit Pal Singh <ajitpal.singh@...com>,
	Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...il.com>,
	Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@...com>,
	Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@...com>, kernel@...inux.com,
	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 12/14] regulator: pwm: Retrieve correct voltage

Hi,

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 12:02 AM, Thierry Reding
<thierry.reding@...il.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 09, 2016 at 11:47:18AM +0200, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 05:43:02PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>
>> > Mark, do you want me to provide a stable branch with the PWM regulator
>> > patches and resolve that conflict in your tree? Or would you rather take
>> > the whole set based on a stable branch from the PWM tree? Or maybe yet
>> > another possibility would be to base the PWM tree on a stable branch
>> > from the regulator tree containing the above commit.
>>
>> Probably easiest to use this signed tag and resolve it in your tree:
>>
>> The following changes since commit 1a695a905c18548062509178b98bc91e67510864:
>>
>>   Linux 4.7-rc1 (2016-05-29 09:29:24 -0700)
>>
>> are available in the git repository at:
>>
>>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git tags/pwm-modernization
>>
>> for you to fetch changes up to c2588393e6315ab68207323d37d2a73713d6bc81:
>>
>>   regulator: pwm: Fix regulator ramp delay for continuous mode (2016-07-07 11:45:06 +0200)
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> regulator: Provide a branch for moderninzation of the PWM code
>>
>> There's a new, improved PWM API which allows a lot of improvements in
>> the PWM regulator driver.  Since the bulk of the changes are in the PWM
>> API this is being managed in the PWM tree, merge pending regulator API
>> changes to allow this to be resolved more easily.
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> Alexandre Courbot (1):
>>       regulator: pwm: Support for enable GPIO
>>
>> Boris Brezillon (1):
>>       regulator: pwm: Drop unneeded pwm_enable() call
>>
>> Douglas Anderson (1):
>>       regulator: pwm: Fix regulator ramp delay for continuous mode
>>
>>  .../bindings/regulator/pwm-regulator.txt           |  7 +++-
>>  drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c                  | 40 ++++++++++++++++++----
>>  2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> Merged into for-4.8/regulator of the PWM tree and rebased Boris'
> pwm-regulator patches on top.
>
> Boris, everything looks right to me, but can you take a quick look to
> see if it all matches up with what you expect?

As I mentioned in the other thread about the linuxnext conflict,
pwm_regulator_set_voltage() is wrong.

You have:

  ramp_delay = DIV_ROUND_UP(abs(min_uV - old_uV), ramp_delay);

You should have:

  ramp_delay = DIV_ROUND_UP(abs(req_min_uV - old_uV), ramp_delay);

-Doug