linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 11/13] KVM: x86: add KVM_CAP_X2APIC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <26250689-9263-58a0-7700-1fa83a1dc96e@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 11 Jul 2016 16:56:39 +0800
From:	Yang Zhang <yang.zhang.wz@...il.com>
To:	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
	Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	"Lan, Tianyu" <tianyu.lan@...el.com>,
	Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...hat.com>,
	Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@....de>, Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/13] KVM: x86: add KVM_CAP_X2APIC_API

On 2016/7/11 15:44, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 11/07/2016 08:06, Yang Zhang wrote:
>>> Changes to MSI addresses follow the format used by interrupt remapping
>>> unit.
>>> The upper address word, that used to be 0, contains upper 24 bits of
>>> the LAPIC
>>> address in its upper 24 bits.  Lower 8 bits are reserved as 0.
>>> Using the upper address word is not backward-compatible either as we
>>> didn't
>>> check that userspace zeroed the word.  Reserved bits are still not
>>> explicitly
>>
>> Does this means we cannot migrate the VM from KVM_CAP_X2APIC_API enabled
>> host to the disable host even VM doesn't have more than 255 VCPUs?
>
> Yes, but that's why KVM_CAP_X2APIC_API is enabled manually.  The idea is
> that QEMU will not use KVM_CAP_X2APIC_API except on the newest machine type.

Thanks for confirmation. And when the KVM_CAP_X2APIC_API will be enabled 
in Qemu?

>
> If interrupt remapping is on, KVM_CAP_X2APIC_API is needed even with 8
> VCPUs, I think.  Otherwise KVM will believe that 0xff is "broadcast"
> rather than "cluster 0, CPUs 0-7".

If interrupt remapping is using, what 0xff means is relying on which 
mode the destination CPU is in. I think there is no KVM_CAP_X2APIC_API 
needed since interrupt remapping table gives all the information.

-- 
best regards
yang