linux-kernel - Re: arm64: implement live patching

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160711215807.GA23097@packer-debian-8-amd64.digitalocean.com>
Date:	Mon, 11 Jul 2016 17:58:07 -0400
From:	Jessica Yu <jeyu@...hat.com>
To:	Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
Cc:	Torsten Duwe <duwe@....de>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, takahiro.akashi@...aro.org,
	Jungseok Lee <jungseoklee85@...il.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Li Bin <huawei.libin@...wei.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Christopher Li <sparse@...isli.org>,
	Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>, andrew.wafaa@....com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: arm64: implement live patching

+++ Miroslav Benes [11/07/16 16:03 +0200]:
>On Mon, 27 Jun 2016, Torsten Duwe wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/livepatch.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/livepatch.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..6b9a3d1
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/livepatch.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
>> +/*
>> + * livepatch.h - arm64-specific Kernel Live Patching Core
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (C) 2016 SUSE
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
>> + * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
>> + * as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2
>> + * of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
>> + *
>> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
>> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
>> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
>> + *
>> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
>> + * along with this program; if not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
>> + */
>> +#ifndef _ASM_ARM64_LIVEPATCH_H
>> +#define _ASM_ARM64_LIVEPATCH_H
>> +
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/ftrace.h>
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_LIVEPATCH
>
>A nit but we removed such guards in the other header files.
>
>> +static inline int klp_check_compiler_support(void)
>> +{
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void klp_arch_set_pc(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long ip)
>> +{
>> +	regs->pc = ip;
>> +}
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_LIVEPATCH */
>
>I also checked mod_arch_specific structure because of the way we deal
>with relocations. It is defined only if CONFIG_ARM64_MODULE_PLTS is
>enabled and there is a pointer to 'struct elf64_shdr' called plt. It is
>used indirectly in apply_relocate_add() so we need it to stay. However it
>points to an existing Elf section and SHF_ALLOC is added to its sh_flags
>in module_frob_arch_sections() (arch/arm64/kernel/module-plts.c).
>Therefore we should be ok.
>
>Jessica, could you check it as well, please?

That sounds right, the plt will remain in module core memory, so we
are fine there.

However I think the plt->sh_size calculation will be incorrect for
livepatch modules. In calculating mod->arch.plt_max_entries (see:
module-plts.c), count_plts() is called for every rela section.
For livepatch modules, this means count_plts() will also be called for
our .klp.rela sections, which is correct behavior. However,
count_plts() only considers relas referring to SHN_UNDEF symbols, and
since every rela in a klp rela section refers to a SHN_LIVEPATCH
symbol, these are all ignored. So count_plts() may return an incorrect
value for a klp rela section.

Miroslav, can you confirm the issue? I think the fix would be easy
though; we can just add an additional check for SHN_LIVEPATCH in
count_plts(). 

Jessica