lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 12 Jul 2016 15:05:51 +0300
From:	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To:	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
	Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@...il.com>,
	Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
	Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@...gle.com>,
	syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>,
	Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: thp: refix false positive BUG in
 page_move_anon_rmap()

On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 04:51:20AM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> The VM_BUG_ON_PAGE in page_move_anon_rmap() is more trouble than it's
> worth: the syzkaller fuzzer hit it again.  It's still wrong for some
> THP cases, because linear_page_index() was never intended to apply to
> addresses before the start of a vma.
> 
> That's easily fixed with a signed long cast inside linear_page_index();
> and Dmitry has tested such a patch, to verify the false positive.  But
> why extend linear_page_index() just for this case? when the avoidance
> in page_move_anon_rmap() has already grown ugly, and there's no reason
> for the check at all (nothing else there is using address or index).
> 
> Remove address arg from page_move_anon_rmap(), remove VM_BUG_ON_PAGE,
> remove CONFIG_DEBUG_VM PageTransHuge adjustment.
> 
> And one more thing: should the compound_head(page) be done inside or
> outside page_move_anon_rmap()?  It's usually pushed down to the lowest
> level nowadays (and mm/memory.c shows no other explicit use of it),
> so I think it's better done in page_move_anon_rmap() than by caller.

I agree, that's reasonable.

> Fixes: 0798d3c022dc ("mm: thp: avoid false positive VM_BUG_ON_PAGE in page_move_anon_rmap()")
> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
> Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # 4.5+

Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>

> ---
> Of course, we could just do a patch that deletes the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE
> (and CONFIG_DEBUG_VM PageTransHuge adjustment) for now, and the cleanup
> afterwards - but this doesn't affect a widely used interface, or go back
> many stable releases, so personally I prefer to do it all in one go.

+1.

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ