lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8dd68d9b-9455-d593-dc0f-c269c778b961@osg.samsung.com>
Date:	Tue, 12 Jul 2016 11:03:32 -0400
From:	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
To:	Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>, kyungmin.park@...sung.com,
	k.debski@...sung.com, jtp.park@...sung.com, mchehab@...nel.org
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: s5p-mfc Fix misspelled error message and
 checkpatch errors

Hello Shuah,

On 07/11/2016 06:39 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> Fix misspelled error message and existing checkpatch errors in the
> error message conditional.
> 
> WARNING: suspect code indent for conditional statements (8, 24)
>  	if (ctx->state != MFCINST_HEAD_PARSED &&
> [...]
> +               mfc_err("Can not get crop information\n");
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
> ---

Patch looks good to me. Maybe is better to split the message and checkpatch
changes in two different patches. But I don't have a strong opinion on this:

Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ