[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1c0e2da2-115e-d676-cfec-e572270789ca@suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 11:12:51 +0200
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/17] mm, compaction: make whole_zone flag ignore
cached scanner positions
On 07/06/2016 07:09 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:54:29AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> A recent patch has added whole_zone flag that compaction sets when scanning
>> starts from the zone boundary, in order to report that zone has been fully
>> scanned in one attempt. For allocations that want to try really hard or cannot
>> fail, we will want to introduce a mode where scanning whole zone is guaranteed
>> regardless of the cached positions.
>>
>> This patch reuses the whole_zone flag in a way that if it's already passed true
>> to compaction, the cached scanner positions are ignored. Employing this flag
>
> Okay. But, please don't reset cached scanner position even if whole_zone
> flag is set. Just set cc->migrate_pfn and free_pfn, appropriately. With
Won't that result in confusion on cached position updates during
compaction where it checks the previous cached position? I wonder what
kinds of corner cases it can bring...
> your following patches, whole_zone could be set without any compaction
> try
I don't understand what you mean here? Even after whole series,
whole_zone is only checked, and positions thus reset, after passing the
compaction_suitable() call from compact_zone(). So at that point we can
say that compaction is being actually tried and it's not a drive-by reset?
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists