[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160718091029.GA32259@ulmo.ba.sec>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 11:10:29 +0200
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
Stephen Barber <smbarber@...omium.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
Enric Balletbo <enric.balletbo@...labora.co.uk>,
Randall Spangler <rspangler@...omium.org>,
Shawn Nematbakhsh <shawnn@...omium.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Todd Broch <tbroch@...omium.org>,
Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@...omium.org>,
Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] pwm: add support for ChromeOS EC PWM
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 09:49:28AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jul 2016, Brian Norris wrote:
> > This is the 4th (and final?) version of my series to support the new ChromeOS
> > EC PWM API, so we can control, e.g., a PWM backlight when its PWM is attached
> > to the EC. It uses Boris's latest "atomic" hooks for the PWM API (i.e., the
> > ->apply() callback), which were recently merged.
> >
> > Pulled and adapted the cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status() helper from this patch, with
> > some minor modifications:
> >
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/4/12/342
> >
> > Note that after some style bikeshedding, I proposed to put off rewriting the
> > entire cros_ec_commands.h header at the moment, due to the shared nature of
> > this file. Follow up here:
> >
> > https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=621123
> >
> > As this touches MFD (sort of), drivers/platform/chrome/, and drivers/pwm/, I'm
> > still not sure who it should all go through: Lee, Thierry, or Olof?
>
> I usually take this type of submission through the MFD tree, although
> it's too late in the day to make it into v4.8.
>
> Which Acks are you missing?
I'm willing to take this through the PWM tree if you're okay with the
MFD changes. I can put the MFD changes into a separate branch and you
could pull that in if you needed to resolve any dependencies, which I
think would be quite unlikely if you've already closed your tree.
Thierry
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists