[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160718132426.GB17074@dell>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 14:24:26 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
Stephen Barber <smbarber@...omium.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
Enric Balletbo <enric.balletbo@...labora.co.uk>,
Randall Spangler <rspangler@...omium.org>,
Shawn Nematbakhsh <shawnn@...omium.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Todd Broch <tbroch@...omium.org>,
Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@...omium.org>,
Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] pwm: add support for ChromeOS EC PWM
On Mon, 18 Jul 2016, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 09:49:28AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 Jul 2016, Brian Norris wrote:
> > > This is the 4th (and final?) version of my series to support the new ChromeOS
> > > EC PWM API, so we can control, e.g., a PWM backlight when its PWM is attached
> > > to the EC. It uses Boris's latest "atomic" hooks for the PWM API (i.e., the
> > > ->apply() callback), which were recently merged.
> > >
> > > Pulled and adapted the cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status() helper from this patch, with
> > > some minor modifications:
> > >
> > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/4/12/342
> > >
> > > Note that after some style bikeshedding, I proposed to put off rewriting the
> > > entire cros_ec_commands.h header at the moment, due to the shared nature of
> > > this file. Follow up here:
> > >
> > > https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=621123
> > >
> > > As this touches MFD (sort of), drivers/platform/chrome/, and drivers/pwm/, I'm
> > > still not sure who it should all go through: Lee, Thierry, or Olof?
> >
> > I usually take this type of submission through the MFD tree, although
> > it's too late in the day to make it into v4.8.
> >
> > Which Acks are you missing?
>
> I'm willing to take this through the PWM tree if you're okay with the
> MFD changes. I can put the MFD changes into a separate branch and you
> could pull that in if you needed to resolve any dependencies, which I
> think would be quite unlikely if you've already closed your tree.
Are you saying that you're willing to take these straight into the
merge-window, with no soak in -next?
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists