[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160718202026.GB137880@google.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 13:20:26 -0700
From: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
To: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@...org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
Graham Moore <grmoore@...nsource.altera.com>,
Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [mtd-next:master 30/33]
drivers/mtd/spi-nor/cadence-quadspi.c:529:4: error: implicit declaration of
function 'readsl'
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 03:43:17AM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
> tree: git://git.infradead.org/linux-mtd-next.git master
> head: f78921b9020c510ed222a6c2402e2aa126432415
> commit: 140623410536905fa6ab737b625decfde6c64a72 [30/33] mtd: spi-nor: Add driver for Cadence Quad SPI Flash Controller
> config: x86_64-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
> compiler: gcc-6 (Debian 6.1.1-1) 6.1.1 20160430
> reproduce:
> git checkout 140623410536905fa6ab737b625decfde6c64a72
> # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> make ARCH=x86_64
>
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/cadence-quadspi.c: In function 'cqspi_indirect_read_execute':
> >> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/cadence-quadspi.c:529:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'readsl' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> readsl(ahb_base, rxbuf, DIV_ROUND_UP(bytes_to_read, 4));
> ^~~~~~
> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/cadence-quadspi.c: In function 'cqspi_indirect_write_execute':
> >> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/cadence-quadspi.c:613:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'writesl' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> writesl(cqspi->ahb_base, txbuf, DIV_ROUND_UP(write_bytes, 4));
> ^~~~~~~
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
Hmm, does x86 not define readsl()/writesl()? I can never tell what
accessors are supposed to be "standard" across architectures.
Either we need to drop the COMPILE_TEST or maybe make it (!X86 &&
COMPILE_TEST).
Brian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists