[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <578DC294.5090605@denx.de>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 08:03:00 +0200
From: Stefan Roese <sr@...x.de>
To: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
kbuild-all@...org, Graham Moore <grmoore@...nsource.altera.com>
Subject: Re: [mtd-next:master 30/33]
drivers/mtd/spi-nor/cadence-quadspi.c:529:4: error: implicit declaration of
function 'readsl'
On 18.07.2016 22:20, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 03:43:17AM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
>> tree: git://git.infradead.org/linux-mtd-next.git master
>> head: f78921b9020c510ed222a6c2402e2aa126432415
>> commit: 140623410536905fa6ab737b625decfde6c64a72 [30/33] mtd: spi-nor: Add driver for Cadence Quad SPI Flash Controller
>> config: x86_64-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
>> compiler: gcc-6 (Debian 6.1.1-1) 6.1.1 20160430
>> reproduce:
>> git checkout 140623410536905fa6ab737b625decfde6c64a72
>> # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>> make ARCH=x86_64
>>
>> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>
>> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/cadence-quadspi.c: In function 'cqspi_indirect_read_execute':
>>>> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/cadence-quadspi.c:529:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'readsl' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>> readsl(ahb_base, rxbuf, DIV_ROUND_UP(bytes_to_read, 4));
>> ^~~~~~
>> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/cadence-quadspi.c: In function 'cqspi_indirect_write_execute':
>>>> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/cadence-quadspi.c:613:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'writesl' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>> writesl(cqspi->ahb_base, txbuf, DIV_ROUND_UP(write_bytes, 4));
>> ^~~~~~~
>> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>
> Hmm, does x86 not define readsl()/writesl()? I can never tell what
> accessors are supposed to be "standard" across architectures.
>
> Either we need to drop the COMPILE_TEST or maybe make it (!X86 &&
> COMPILE_TEST).
iowrite32_rep() etc should work for x86 as well.
Thanks,
Stefan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists