lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160718234132.GI2207@kernel.org>
Date:	Mon, 18 Jul 2016 20:41:32 -0300
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the
 luto-misc tree

Em Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 08:22:35AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell escreveu:
> Hi Arnaldo,
> 
> On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 17:36:34 -0300 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Em Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 01:04:34PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski escreveu:
> > > On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:  
> > > > On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 12:43:26 -0300 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com> wrote:  
> > 
> > > >> Ok, same results, it works, queuing this one, ack? Stephen, does it work
> > > >> for you?  
> > 
> > > > Sorry, no.  See my other email.
> > > >
> > > > I am cross building (if that makes a difference).  
> > 
> > For me to try to reproduce the problem, yes, what is the environment?
> > Cross-compiling to what target?
> 
> I am using a x86_64 compiler (target) on powerpc64le (host).
> Yesterday, the x86_64 allmodconfig build failed just after I merged the
> tip tree (i.e. without the luto-misc tree being involved).  At that
> point I have merged quite a few trees, though.  Also, I do not clean my
> object tree between builds.  The compiler is v5.2.0 built from upstream
> sources.

Ok, one of the possible reasons was for tools/{include,lib,perf,objtool}
code to be including code directly from the kernel, and that was still
the case for some headers, I fixed those and pushed to Ingo now, if he
pulls lets see if this fixes things.

- Arnaldo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ