[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160719102629.0a12a1a1@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 10:26:29 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the
luto-misc tree
Hi Arnaldo,
On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 20:41:32 -0300 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Ok, one of the possible reasons was for tools/{include,lib,perf,objtool}
> code to be including code directly from the kernel, and that was still
> the case for some headers, I fixed those and pushed to Ingo now, if he
> pulls lets see if this fixes things.
If you have a single patch (or few) relative to yesterday's tip tree,
please send it to me as well and I will apply it as a fix patch if Ingo
doesn't get to pulling in time.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Powered by blists - more mailing lists