linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160719003906.GJ2207@kernel.org>
Date:	Mon, 18 Jul 2016 21:39:06 -0300
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the
 luto-misc tree

Em Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 10:26:29AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell escreveu:
> On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 20:41:32 -0300 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> wrote:
> > Ok, one of the possible reasons was for tools/{include,lib,perf,objtool}
> > code to be including code directly from the kernel, and that was still
> > the case for some headers, I fixed those and pushed to Ingo now, if he
> > pulls lets see if this fixes things.
 
> If you have a single patch (or few) relative to yesterday's tip tree,
> please send it to me as well and I will apply it as a fix patch if Ingo
> doesn't get to pulling in time.

[acme@...et linux]$ git log --pretty=oneline  9fcfcdf3c7b613c0d9536f57587456411b8a4e33..ae3c14a028ed10552803b68276b6833295ba18cf 
ae3c14a028ed10552803b68276b6833295ba18cf tools: Copy linux/{hash,poison}.h and check for drift
3aa0042769313b720142c0ef8514dac389e14ebe perf tools: Remove include/linux/list.h from perf's MANIFEST
de1e17b1d0c81be472039798698b517c8a68b516 tools: Copy the bitops files accessed from the kernel and check for drift
ad430729ae00dd63f7dcadbeb638e589bc03b5a3 Remove: kernel unistd*h files from perf's MANIFEST, not used
e0643c4e9fdb2e77ab83ca596460e2c9c15728aa perf tools: Remove tools/perf/util/include/linux/const.h
7e3f36411342a54f1981fa97b43550b8406a3d69 perf tools: Remove tools/perf/util/include/asm/byteorder.h
14f0652b4fbebd0b05da36a06b17ac6d4d87a8f8 perf tools: Add missing linux/compiler.h include to perf-sys.h

Available on my repo/branch:

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git perf/core

I don't know exactly how linux-next works, would it be possible to merge in this branch
till it gets into tip/perf/core?

- Arnaldo