linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 19 Jul 2016 13:26:08 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the
 luto-misc tree

Hi Arnaldo,

On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 21:39:06 -0300 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Em Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 10:26:29AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell escreveu:
>  
> > If you have a single patch (or few) relative to yesterday's tip tree,
> > please send it to me as well and I will apply it as a fix patch if Ingo
> > doesn't get to pulling in time.  
> 
> [acme@...et linux]$ git log --pretty=oneline  9fcfcdf3c7b613c0d9536f57587456411b8a4e33..ae3c14a028ed10552803b68276b6833295ba18cf 
> ae3c14a028ed10552803b68276b6833295ba18cf tools: Copy linux/{hash,poison}.h and check for drift
> 3aa0042769313b720142c0ef8514dac389e14ebe perf tools: Remove include/linux/list.h from perf's MANIFEST
> de1e17b1d0c81be472039798698b517c8a68b516 tools: Copy the bitops files accessed from the kernel and check for drift
> ad430729ae00dd63f7dcadbeb638e589bc03b5a3 Remove: kernel unistd*h files from perf's MANIFEST, not used
> e0643c4e9fdb2e77ab83ca596460e2c9c15728aa perf tools: Remove tools/perf/util/include/linux/const.h
> 7e3f36411342a54f1981fa97b43550b8406a3d69 perf tools: Remove tools/perf/util/include/asm/byteorder.h
> 14f0652b4fbebd0b05da36a06b17ac6d4d87a8f8 perf tools: Add missing linux/compiler.h include to perf-sys.h
> 
> Available on my repo/branch:
> 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git perf/core
> 
> I don't know exactly how linux-next works, would it be possible to merge in this branch
> till it gets into tip/perf/core?

OK, I added this to linux-next today (as a temporary measure), but it
fails the same way.  To be clear, I merged the above branch (without
the rest of the tip tree) and it fails the same way. :-(

It produces these errors (from the x86_64 allmodconfig build):

In file included from /home/sfr/next/next/tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/bitsperlong.h:10:0,
                 from /usr/include/asm-generic/int-ll64.h:11,
                 from /usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/asm/types.h:27,
                 from /home/sfr/next/next/tools/include/linux/types.h:9,
                 from /home/sfr/next/next/tools/include/linux/list.h:4,
                 from elf.h:23,
                 from elf.c:30:
/home/sfr/next/next/tools/include/asm-generic/bitsperlong.h:13:2: error: #error Inconsistent word size. Check asm/bitsperlong.h
 #error Inconsistent word size. Check asm/bitsperlong.h
  ^

(and more similar).

I have applied my patch from yesterday ("tools: Simplify
__BITS_PER_LONG define"), and will continue on.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell