[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52d1cd85-8bdc-c8ed-7a2c-460cefe7f0d5@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 15:30:07 +0700
From: Lars Melin <larsm17@...il.com>
To: Kristian Evensen <kristian.evensen@...il.com>,
Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] cdc_ether: Improve ZTE MF823/831/910 handling
On 2016-07-19 13:40, Kristian Evensen wrote:
> I guess I can match on the VID/PID in usbnet, but won't it be cleaner
> to add a new bind() function (in cdc_ether) which matches the two PIDs
> and leave usbnet as is? Or am I misunderstanding how to add this
> functionality to usbnet?
>
Matching on the usb id is probably not a great idea, there is more id's
than the two you have found and there is also more than two non-unique
mac addresses.
Example:
0200FFAAAAAA 19d2:1589/1592/1595
020CE70B0102 19d2:1040/1048/1405
You can easily find them by googling them, without colon separators you
will find them in verbose lsusb listings, with colons you will find them
in dmesg pastings.
I would probably have found more dupes if users had refrained from using
the stupid usbdevices cmd which removes almost all interesting info from
device listings in internet foras.
/Lars
Powered by blists - more mailing lists