lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <578E7317.50104@bfs.de>
Date:	Tue, 19 Jul 2016 20:36:07 +0200
From:	walter harms <wharms@....de>
To:	SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
CC:	linux-media@...r.kernel.org, Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [media] v4l2-common: Delete an unnecessary check before
 the function call "spi_unregister_device"



Am 19.07.2016 20:02, schrieb SF Markus Elfring:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 19:54:16 +0200
> 
> The spi_unregister_device() function tests whether its argument is NULL
> and then returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.
> 
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> ---
>  drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-common.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-common.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-common.c
> index 5b80850..57cfe26a 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-common.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-common.c
> @@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ struct v4l2_subdev *v4l2_spi_new_subdev(struct v4l2_device *v4l2_dev,
>  error:
>  	/* If we have a client but no subdev, then something went wrong and
>  	   we must unregister the client. */
> -	if (spi && sd == NULL)
> +	if (!sd)
>  		spi_unregister_device(spi);
>  
>  	return sd;


if i read the code correct sd is always NULL at this point.
so this was wrong in the first place and you must remove sd also.


re,
 wh




Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ