linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Input: tsc200x - Report proper input

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160720074851.GA9577@amd>
Date:	Wed, 20 Jul 2016 09:48:51 +0200
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	Michael Welling <mwelling@...e.org>
Cc:	kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-input@...r.kernel.org, pali.rohar@...il.com, sre@...nel.org,
	ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com, patrikbachan@...il.com,
	serge@...lyn.com, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: tsc200x - Report proper input_dev name

On Wed 2016-07-20 02:06:17, Michael Welling wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 08:54:05AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > By same logic we shouldn't change from TSC200X back to TSC2005 because of
> > > people's possibly new setup in the last 9 months.
> > 
> > That's your, broken logic.
> > 
> > TSC200X->TSC2005 needs to be fixed, because people seen the TSC2005
> > for past few years.
> > 
> > TSC200X->TSC2004 is just introducing regression, because noone ever
> > seen TSC2004, AFAICT.
> 
> I am pretty sure no one cares. Escpecially me.

Dunno. Lets do the right thing: TSC2005 for 2005, TSC200X for everyone
else. Interface issues are tricky to handle once created, so its best
to be careful.

									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html