linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH] ARM: tegra: fix erroneous address in dts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6423681.52qkIkgFBQ@wuerfel>
Date:	Thu, 21 Jul 2016 14:28:55 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc:	arm@...nel.org, Ralf Ramsauer <ralf@...ses-pyramidenbau.de>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] ARM: tegra: fix erroneous address in dts

On Monday, July 18, 2016 11:58:02 AM CEST Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 11:46:48AM +0200, Ralf Ramsauer wrote:
> > c90bb7b enabled the high speed UARTs of the Jetson TK1. Due to a merge
> > quirk, wrong addresses were introduced. Fix it and use the correct
> > addresses.
> > 
> > Thierry let me know, that there is another patch (b5896f67ab3c in
> > linux-next) in preparation which removes all the '0,' prefixes of unit
> > addresses on Tegra124 and is planned to go upstream in 4.8, so
> > this patch will get reverted then.
> > 
> > But for the moment, this patch is necessary to fix current misbehaviour.
> > 
> > Fixes: c90bb7b9b9 ("ARM: tegra: Add high speed UARTs to Jetson TK1 device tree")
> > Signed-off-by: Ralf Ramsauer <ralf@...ses-pyramidenbau.de>
> > Acked-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
> > Cc: linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra124-jetson-tk1.dts | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> ARM-SoC maintainers,
> 
> Just to clarify, this is targetted at v4.7 because the offending patch
> was merged in v4.7-rc1. If at all possible it'd be great to get this in,
> even if this is terribly last minute.
> 

I've applied it to the fixes branch, but as Linus is currently offline
and hasn't pulled the previous set of fixes, I suspect it's not
going to make it.

Olof, do you think we should send an amended pull request, or are
we at the point where nothing gets pulled anyway?

	Arnd