[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dc0fb8f4-35cc-11bd-adcc-dce7f9bfee20@ramses-pyramidenbau.de>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 14:37:33 +0200
From: Ralf Ramsauer <ralf@...ses-pyramidenbau.de>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc: arm@...nel.org, Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] ARM: tegra: fix erroneous address in dts
On 07/21/2016 02:28 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday, July 18, 2016 11:58:02 AM CEST Thierry Reding wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 11:46:48AM +0200, Ralf Ramsauer wrote:
>>> c90bb7b enabled the high speed UARTs of the Jetson TK1. Due to a merge
>>> quirk, wrong addresses were introduced. Fix it and use the correct
>>> addresses.
>>>
>>> Thierry let me know, that there is another patch (b5896f67ab3c in
>>> linux-next) in preparation which removes all the '0,' prefixes of unit
>>> addresses on Tegra124 and is planned to go upstream in 4.8, so
>>> this patch will get reverted then.
>>>
>>> But for the moment, this patch is necessary to fix current misbehaviour.
>>>
>>> Fixes: c90bb7b9b9 ("ARM: tegra: Add high speed UARTs to Jetson TK1 device tree")
>>> Signed-off-by: Ralf Ramsauer <ralf@...ses-pyramidenbau.de>
>>> Acked-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
>>> Cc: linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra124-jetson-tk1.dts | 4 ++--
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> ARM-SoC maintainers,
>>
>> Just to clarify, this is targetted at v4.7 because the offending patch
>> was merged in v4.7-rc1. If at all possible it'd be great to get this in,
>> even if this is terribly last minute.
>>
>
Arnd,
> I've applied it to the fixes branch, but as Linus is currently offline
> and hasn't pulled the previous set of fixes, I suspect it's not
> going to make it.
thank you very much. If it's not merged in 4.7 then I'll follow up with
a revert patch with stable in Cc.
Ralf
>
> Olof, do you think we should send an amended pull request, or are
> we at the point where nothing gets pulled anyway?
>
> Arnd
>
--
Ralf Ramsauer
PGP: 0x8F10049B
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists