[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOw6vbK7CnFwH_Tyrq6ab4DBxVLa8-JCYEM-Tu+mOYsKmNULtg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 10:28:06 -0400
From: Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>
To: Yakir Yang <ykk@...k-chips.com>
Cc: Mark Yao <yzq@...k-chips.com>, Inki Dae <inki.dae@...sung.com>,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
Stéphane Marchesin <marcheu@...omium.org>,
Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] drm/bridge: analogix_dp: turn off the panel when
eDP need to disable
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 9:14 AM, Yakir Yang <ykk@...k-chips.com> wrote:
> Some panels (like Sharp LQ123P1JX31) need to be turn off when eDP
> controller stop to send valid video signal, otherwhise panel would
> go burn in, and keep flicker and flicker.
>
> So it's better to turn off the panel when eDP need to disable, and
> we need to turn on the panel in connector->detect() callback, so
> that driver would detect panel status rightly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yakir Yang <ykk@...k-chips.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c
> index 32715da..ea059b3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c
> @@ -961,6 +961,14 @@ analogix_dp_detect(struct drm_connector *connector, bool force)
> {
> struct analogix_dp_device *dp = to_dp(connector);
>
> + /*
> + * Panle would prepare for several times here, but don't worry it
s/Panle/Panel/
> + * would only enable the hardware at the first prepare time.
Errr, this shouldn't go in detect. How about putting this in
bridge_enable instead?
> + */
> + if (dp->plat_data->panel)
> + if (drm_panel_prepare(dp->plat_data->panel))
Personally, I don't like doing work in a conditional since you're
throwing the return code away. Could you break this out into:
ret = drm_panel_prepare(dp->plat_data->panel);
if (ret)
DRM_ERROR("failed to setup the panel ret=%d\n", ret);
> + DRM_ERROR("failed to setup the panel\n");
> +
> if (analogix_dp_detect_hpd(dp))
> return connector_status_disconnected;
>
> @@ -1063,7 +1071,8 @@ static void analogix_dp_bridge_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> return;
>
> if (dp->plat_data->panel) {
> - if (drm_panel_disable(dp->plat_data->panel)) {
> + if (drm_panel_disable(dp->plat_data->panel) ||
> + drm_panel_unprepare(dp->plat_data->panel)) {
Same comment here, please break this out into separate statements for
better readability/logging.
> DRM_ERROR("failed to disable the panel\n");
> return;
> }
> @@ -1333,13 +1342,6 @@ int analogix_dp_bind(struct device *dev, struct drm_device *drm_dev,
>
> phy_power_on(dp->phy);
>
> - if (dp->plat_data->panel) {
> - if (drm_panel_prepare(dp->plat_data->panel)) {
> - DRM_ERROR("failed to setup the panel\n");
> - return -EBUSY;
> - }
> - }
> -
> analogix_dp_init_dp(dp);
>
> ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, dp->irq,
> --
> 1.9.1
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists