[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160721211342.6711a272@endymion>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 21:13:42 +0200
From: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: staging: ks7010: Rename jump labels
Hi Markus,
On Thu, 21 Jul 2016 17:37:52 +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > That being said... checkpatch does not complain about leading space
> > before labels. Not even with --strict. So why are you mentioning it here?
>
> I remembered a warning like "INDENTED_LABEL" instead.
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/scripts/checkpatch.pl?id=92d21ac74a9e3c09b0b01c764e530657e4c85c49#n4326
"#goto labels aren't indented, allow a single space however"
Can't be clearer :-)
> How do you generally think about jump label renaming?
Renaming from "out0:", "out1:" etc to something meaningful, yes. Did
you have anything else in mind?
--
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support
Powered by blists - more mailing lists