[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160721211714.GE23759@htj.duckdns.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 17:17:14 -0400
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: tom.ty89@...il.com
Cc: hare@...e.de, sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com, arnd@...db.de,
sfr@...b.auug.org.au, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend 3/5] libata-scsi: fix overflow in mode page copy
Hello,
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 02:41:52AM +0800, tom.ty89@...il.com wrote:
> From: Tom Yan <tom.ty89@...il.com>
>
> ata_mselect_*() would initialize a char array for storing a copy of
> the current mode page. However, if char was actually signed char,
> overflow could occur.
Do you mean sign extension?
> For example, `0xff` from def_control_mpage[] would be "truncated"
> to `-1`. This prevented ata_mselect_control() from working at all,
> since when it did the read-only bits check, there would always be
> a mismatch.
Heh, the description doesn't really make sense. Are you talking about
something like the following?
char ar[N];
int i;
i = ar[x];
if (i == 0xff)
asdf;
If so, the description isn't quite right.
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists