[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGnHSEnA6JW8joA2dozaqY+hVdN8fjajtpznfSo8j4DwFiE5yw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 02:51:02 +0800
From: Tom Yan <tom.ty89@...il.com>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, sfr@...b.auug.org.au,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend 1/5] libata-scsi: minor cleanup in ata_mselect_*()
This patch should cause no behavioral change. Even the (removal of)
the redundant bit mask should be a nop. So it seems like a bit of an
overkill to split them.
On 22 July 2016 at 02:45, Sergei Shtylyov
<sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 07/21/2016 09:41 PM, tom.ty89@...il.com wrote:
>
>> From: Tom Yan <tom.ty89@...il.com>
>>
>> 1. Removed a repeated bit masking in ata_mselect_control()
>> 2. Moved `wce`/`d_sense` assignment below the page validity checks
>> 3. Added/Removed empty lines where appropriate
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tom Yan <tom.ty89@...il.com>
>
>
> Perhaps Tejun is OK with that, but if you ask me doing 1 task per patch
> is a better practice.
>
> [...]
>
> MBR, Sergei
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists