[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f5224d82-c25e-3ab0-c0a5-85042664f953@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 23:26:30 +0200
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: staging: ks7010: Delete unnecessary uses of the variable "retval"
>> Can you follow expectations around the proposed refactoring of any
>> function implementations?
>
> I don't understand both questions. Maybe you need to give examples?
I suggest to try the following script (semantic patch for working with
the Coccinelle software) out on the discussed source files.
@checking_function_calls_directly@
identifier checker, retval, work;
expression list el;
statement is, es;
type rt;
@@
rt checker(...)
{
<+...
-retval = work(el);
if (
- retval
+ work(el)
)
is
else
es
...+>
}
Do you find such a source code transformation useful?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists