[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160722063720.GB794@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 08:37:20 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
Ondrej Kozina <okozina@...hat.com>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, dm-devel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] mempool: do not consume memory reserves from the
reclaim path
On Thu 21-07-16 16:53:09, Michal Hocko wrote:
> From d64815758c212643cc1750774e2751721685059a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 16:40:59 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] Revert "mm, mempool: only set __GFP_NOMEMALLOC if there are
> free elements"
>
> This reverts commit f9054c70d28bc214b2857cf8db8269f4f45a5e23.
I've noticed that Andrew has already picked this one up. Is anybody
against marking it for stable?
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists