[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1171934212.9737926.1469204427109.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 12:20:27 -0400 (EDT)
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Bandan Das <bsd@...hat.com>
Cc: Dave Jones <dsj@...com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: silencing kvm unimplemented msr spew.
> >> Paolo, would you prefer this, or the other approach you already ack'd ?
> >
> > I think I prefer the other, because vcpu_debug is not ratelimited.
> > If the guest can trigger a printk it should always be ratelimited.
>
> Agree with rate limiting, but making this the default for everything doesn't
> sound right IMO, especially for ignore_msrs=1. vcpu_unimpl is already rate
> limited.
The problem is that your patch removes rate limiting whenever it now
uses vcpu_debug.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists