[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <jpgbn1py6ft.fsf@linux.bootlegged.copy>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 12:37:58 -0400
From: Bandan Das <bsd@...hat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Dave Jones <dsj@...com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: silencing kvm unimplemented msr spew.
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> writes:
>> >> Paolo, would you prefer this, or the other approach you already ack'd ?
>> >
>> > I think I prefer the other, because vcpu_debug is not ratelimited.
>> > If the guest can trigger a printk it should always be ratelimited.
>>
>> Agree with rate limiting, but making this the default for everything doesn't
>> sound right IMO, especially for ignore_msrs=1. vcpu_unimpl is already rate
>> limited.
>
> The problem is that your patch removes rate limiting whenever it now
> uses vcpu_debug.
I was suggesting Dave to do something like what I posted but with a new
vcpu_debug_ratelimited.
> Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists