[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160725204825.GA144142@google.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 13:48:25 -0700
From: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
Enric Balletbo <enric.balletbo@...labora.co.uk>,
Shawn Nematbakhsh <shawnn@...omium.org>,
Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@...omium.org>,
Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c: cros-ec-tunnel: Fix usage of cros_ec_cmd_xfer()
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 10:43:13PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 11:14:10AM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> > cros_ec_cmd_xfer returns success status if the command transport
> > completes successfully, but the execution result is incorrectly ignored.
> > In many cases, the execution result is assumed to be successful, leading
> > to ignored errors and operating on uninitialized data.
> >
> > We've recently introduced the cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status() helper to avoid these
> > problems. Let's use it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
>
> I agree with Dmitry about Thierry pushing the patch. So:
>
> Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Fine with me, as long as Thierry is up for it.
BTW, I think the dependency is on target for v4.8-rc1, so if Thierry
misses this, then you should be able to apply this yourself after the
merge window.
Regards,
Brian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists