linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.6 041/203] autofs braino fix for do

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20160725203430.944201746@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Mon, 25 Jul 2016 13:54:16 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: [PATCH 4.6 041/203] autofs braino fix for do_last()

4.6-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>

commit e6ec03a25f12b312b7e0c037fe4a6471c4ee5665 upstream.

It's an analogue of commit 7500c38a (fix the braino in "namei:
massage lookup_slow() to be usable by lookup_one_len_unlocked()").
The same problem (->lookup()-returned unhashed negative dentry
just might be an autofs one with ->d_manage() that would wait
until the daemon makes it positive) applies in do_last() - we
need to do follow_managed() first.

Fortunately, remaining callers of follow_managed() are OK - only
autofs has that weirdness (negative dentry that does not mean
an instant -ENOENT)) and autofs never has its negative dentries
hashed, so we can't pick one from a dcache lookup.

->d_manage() is a bloody mess ;-/

Spotted-by: Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/namei.c |    8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/namei.c
@@ -3173,6 +3173,10 @@ retry_lookup:
 		got_write = false;
 	}

+	error = follow_managed(&path, nd);
+	if (unlikely(error < 0))
+		return error;
+
 	if (unlikely(d_is_negative(path.dentry))) {
 		path_to_nameidata(&path, nd);
 		return -ENOENT;
@@ -3188,10 +3192,6 @@ retry_lookup:
 		return -EEXIST;
 	}

-	error = follow_managed(&path, nd);
-	if (unlikely(error < 0))
-		return error;
-
 	seq = 0;	/* out of RCU mode, so the value doesn't matter */
 	inode = d_backing_inode(path.dentry);
 finish_lookup: