[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57987AF6.1050105@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 17:12:22 +0800
From: Bob Liu <bob.liu@...cle.com>
To: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@...rix.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
konrad.wilk@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] xen-blkfront: dynamic configuration of per-vbd resources
On 07/27/2016 04:07 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
..[snip]..
>> @@ -2443,6 +2674,22 @@ static void blkfront_connect(struct blkfront_info *info)
>> return;
>> }
>>
>> + err = device_create_file(&info->xbdev->dev, &dev_attr_max_ring_page_order);
>> + if (err)
>> + goto fail;
>> +
>> + err = device_create_file(&info->xbdev->dev, &dev_attr_max_indirect_segs);
>> + if (err) {
>> + device_remove_file(&info->xbdev->dev, &dev_attr_max_ring_page_order);
>> + goto fail;
>> + }
>> +
>> + err = device_create_file(&info->xbdev->dev, &dev_attr_max_queues);
>> + if (err) {
>> + device_remove_file(&info->xbdev->dev, &dev_attr_max_ring_page_order);
>> + device_remove_file(&info->xbdev->dev, &dev_attr_max_indirect_segs);
>> + goto fail;
>> + }
>> xenbus_switch_state(info->xbdev, XenbusStateConnected);
>>
>> /* Kick pending requests. */
>> @@ -2453,6 +2700,12 @@ static void blkfront_connect(struct blkfront_info *info)
>> add_disk(info->gd);
>>
>> info->is_ready = 1;
>> + return;
>> +
>> +fail:
>> + blkif_free(info, 0);
>> + xlvbd_release_gendisk(info);
>> + return;
>
> Hm, I'm not sure whether this chunk should be in a separate patch, it seems
> like blkfront_connect doesn't properly cleanup on error (if
> xlvbd_alloc_gendisk fails blkif_free will not be called). Do you think you
> could send the addition of the 'fail' label as a separate patch and fix the
> error path of xlvbd_alloc_gendisk?
>
Sure, will fix all of your comments above.
>> }
>>
>> /**
>> @@ -2500,8 +2753,16 @@ static void blkback_changed(struct xenbus_device *dev,
>> break;
>>
>> case XenbusStateClosed:
>> - if (dev->state == XenbusStateClosed)
>> + if (dev->state == XenbusStateClosed) {
>> + if (info->reconfiguring)
>> + if (blkfront_resume(info->xbdev)) {
>
> Could you please join those two conditions:
>
> if (info->reconfiguring && blkfront_resume(info->xbdev)) { ...
>
> Also, I'm not sure this is correct, if blkfront sees the "Closing" state on
> blkback it will try to close the frontend and destroy the block device (see
> blkfront_closing), and this should be avoided. You should call
> blkfront_resume as soon as you see the backend move to the Closed or Closing
> states, without calling blkfront_closing.
>
I didn't get how this can happen, backend state won't be changed to 'Closing' before blkfront_closing() is called.
So I think current logic is fine.
Btw: could you please ack [PATCH v2 2/3] xen-blkfront: introduce blkif_set_queue_limits()?
Thank you!
Bob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists