lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 27 Jul 2016 09:29:08 +0000
From:	Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@...rix.com>
To:	Bob Liu <bob.liu@...cle.com>,
	Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@...rix.com>
CC:	"xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3] xen-blkfront: dynamic configuration of
	per-vbd resources

> -----Original Message-----
[snip]
> >
> > Also, I'm not sure this is correct, if blkfront sees the "Closing" state on
> > blkback it will try to close the frontend and destroy the block device (see
> > blkfront_closing), and this should be avoided. You should call
> > blkfront_resume as soon as you see the backend move to the Closed or
> Closing
> > states, without calling blkfront_closing.
> >
> 
> I didn't get how this can happen, backend state won't be changed to 'Closing'
> before blkfront_closing() is called.
> So I think current logic is fine.
> 

Backends can go to closing before frontends, when the PV device is being detached.

  Paul 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ