[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160728081255.GB14682@hardcore>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 10:12:55 +0200
From: Jan Glauber <jan.glauber@...iumnetworks.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>,
"Steven J . Hill" <steven.hill@...ium.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] spi: octeon: Add thunderx driver
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 07:08:24PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 07:56:22PM +0200, Jan Glauber wrote:
> > Add ThunderX SPI driver using the shared part from the Octeon
> > driver. The main difference of the ThunderX driver is that it
> > is a PCI device so probing is different. The system clock settings
> > can be specified in device tree.
>
> Don't send individual patches in reply to the middle of threads, it
> makes it really confusing what's going on. I now have multiple patches
> from you for this driver completely unthreaded in my inbox with no
> indication of ordering or anything. Please resend anything that's
> pending as a proper patch series.
With multiple being exactly two. I thought it to be easier this way
around and the ordering to be obvious (if you use threading),
but of course I can resend the two patches as a new series.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists