[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPAsAGxDOvD64+5T4vPiuJgHkdHaaXGRfikFxXGHDRRiW4ivVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 18:21:12 +0300
From: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [4.7+] various memory corruption reports.
2016-07-29 18:19 GMT+03:00 Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 11:05:14AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > I've just gotten back into running trinity on daily pulls of master, and it seems pretty horrific
> > right now. I can reproduce some kind of memory corruption within a couple minutes runtime.
> >
> > ,,,
> >
> > I'll work on narrowing down the exact syscalls needed to trigger this.
>
> Even limiting it to do just a simple syscall like execve (which fails most the time in trinity)
> triggers it, suggesting it's not syscall related, but the fact that trinity is forking/killing
> tons of processes at high rate is stressing something more fundamental.
>
> Given how easy this reproduces, I'll see if bisecting gives up something useful.
I suspect this is false positives due to changes in KASAN.
Bisection probably will point to
80a9201a5965f4715d5c09790862e0df84ce0614 ("mm, kasan: switch SLUB to
stackdepot, enable memory quarantine for SLUB)"
Powered by blists - more mailing lists