[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160729154929.GA30611@codemonkey.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 11:49:29 -0400
From: Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>
To: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [4.7+] various memory corruption reports.
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 06:21:12PM +0300, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> 2016-07-29 18:19 GMT+03:00 Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>:
> > On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 11:05:14AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > I've just gotten back into running trinity on daily pulls of master, and it seems pretty horrific
> > > right now. I can reproduce some kind of memory corruption within a couple minutes runtime.
> > >
> > > ,,,
> > >
> > > I'll work on narrowing down the exact syscalls needed to trigger this.
> >
> > Even limiting it to do just a simple syscall like execve (which fails most the time in trinity)
> > triggers it, suggesting it's not syscall related, but the fact that trinity is forking/killing
> > tons of processes at high rate is stressing something more fundamental.
> >
> > Given how easy this reproduces, I'll see if bisecting gives up something useful.
>
> I suspect this is false positives due to changes in KASAN.
> Bisection probably will point to
> 80a9201a5965f4715d5c09790862e0df84ce0614 ("mm, kasan: switch SLUB to
> stackdepot, enable memory quarantine for SLUB)"
good call. reverting that changeset seems to have solved it.
Dave
Powered by blists - more mailing lists