[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <579EFE6D.3050807@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 08:46:53 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 3/9] irqdomain: Don't set type when mapping an IRQ
On 01/08/16 02:28, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> 2016-07-29 17:10 GMT+09:00 Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>:
>> On 29/07/16 04:53, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>>
>>> I noticed my board would not work any more
>>> when pulling recent updates.
>>>
>>>
>>> I did "git-bisect" and I found the following commit is it.
>>
>> It would help if you did post the log showing the failure.
>>
>> What if you apply the following patch:
>>
>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/maz/arm-platforms.git/diff/arch/arm64/boot/dts/socionext/uniphier-ph1-ld20.dtsi?h=timers/level-trigger&id=95e1fd920fcadce81626cfa9bd6af1a361f17e58
>>
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> Yes, it worked.
>
> But I did not understand why you changed the 3rd cell to 0xf08.
>
>
> The binding of arm,gic-v3.txt says as follows:
>
>
> The 3rd cell is the flags, encoded as follows:
> bits[3:0] trigger type and level flags.
> 1 = edge triggered
> 4 = level triggered
>
>
> Only 1 and 4 are defined for the bits[3:0].
Ah, I didn't realize you were using GICv3.
If you look at the documentation for the A72 timers:
http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.100095_0003_05_en/way1382454511590.html
You'll notice that all timers have an active-low output. Switching to
"level triggered" fixes the issue in general.
> 0xf04 worked, too.
>
> Which is correct?
None of them. 0x04 is the correct answer (as we don't encode the
affinity in the 3rd cell.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists