linux-kernel - Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/7] qemu: Implement virtio-pstore device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 1 Aug 2016 10:21:30 +0100
From:	"Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@...hat.com>
To:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc:	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...il.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	Radim Kr??m???? <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
	Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, qemu-devel@...gnu.org,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
	Anthony Liguori <aliguori@...zon.com>,
	Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/7] qemu: Implement virtio-pstore device

On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 05:38:27PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 02:08:41PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 01:56:07PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 02:39:53PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 03:02:54AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 12:08:30AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > > > > > +static ssize_t virtio_pstore_do_write(VirtIOPstore *s, struct iovec *out_sg,
> > > > > > +                                      unsigned int out_num,
> > > > > > +                                      struct virtio_pstore_req *req)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > +    char path[PATH_MAX];
> > > > > > +    int fd;
> > > > > > +    ssize_t len;
> > > > > > +    unsigned short type;
> > > > > > +    int flags = O_WRONLY | O_CREAT;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +    /* we already consume the req */
> > > > > > +    iov_discard_front(&out_sg, &out_num, sizeof(*req));
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +    virtio_pstore_to_filename(s, path, sizeof(path), req);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +    type = le16_to_cpu(req->type);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +    if (type == VIRTIO_PSTORE_TYPE_DMESG) {
> > > > > > +        flags |= O_TRUNC;
> > > > > > +    } else if (type == VIRTIO_PSTORE_TYPE_CONSOLE) {
> > > > > > +        flags |= O_APPEND;
> > > > > > +    }
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +    fd = open(path, flags, 0644);
> > > > > > +    if (fd < 0) {
> > > > > > +        error_report("cannot open %s", path);
> > > > > > +        return -1;
> > > > > > +    }
> > > > > > +    len = writev(fd, out_sg, out_num);
> > > > > > +    close(fd);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +    return len;
> > > > > 
> > > > > All this is blocking VM until host io completes.
> > > > 
> > > > Hmm.. I don't know about the internals of qemu.  So does it make guest
> > > > stop?  If so, that's what I want to do for _DMESG. :)  As it's called
> > > > only on kernel oops I think it's admittable.  But for _CONSOLE, it
> > > > needs to do asynchronously.  Maybe I can add a thread to do the work.
> > > 
> > > Please look at include/io/channel.h.  QEMU is event-driven and tends to
> > > use asynchronous I/O instead of spawning threads.  The include/io/ APIs
> > > allow you to do asynchronous I/O in the event loop.
> > 
> > That is true, except for I/O to/from plain files - the QIOChannelFile
> > impl doesn't do anything special (yet) to make that work correctly in
> > non-blocking mode. Of course that could be fixed...
> 
> Yep, I don't know how I can use the QIOChannelFile for async IO.
> AFAICS it's just a wrapper for normal readv/writev.  Who is
> responsible to do these IO when I use the IO channel API?  Also does
> it guarantee that all IOs are processed in order?

I'd suggest just using QIOChannelFile regardless - we need to fix the
blocking behaviour already for sake of the qemu chardev code, and your
code just adds more pressure to fix it. I/O will be done in the order
in which you make the calls, as with regular POSIX I/O funcs you're
currently using.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|