[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <579F4D92.6020701@osg.samsung.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 14:24:34 +0100
From: Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@....samsung.com>
To: Salah Triki <salah.triki@...il.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
CC: mhocko@...e.com, vdavydov@...tuozzo.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] fs: befs: remove in vain variable assignment
On 31/07/16 21:34, Salah Triki wrote:
> There is no need to set *value, it will be overwritten later.
>
> Signed-off-by: Salah Triki <salah.triki@...il.com>
> ---
> fs/befs/btree.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/befs/btree.c b/fs/befs/btree.c
> index a0e8cfa..f33fc6c 100644
> --- a/fs/befs/btree.c
> +++ b/fs/befs/btree.c
> @@ -348,8 +348,6 @@ befs_find_key(struct super_block *sb, struct befs_btree_node *node,
>
> befs_debug(sb, "---> %s %s", __func__, findkey);
>
> - *value = 0;
> -
> findkey_len = strlen(findkey);
>
> /* if node can not contain key, just skeep this node */
>
Hi Salah,
The key here is that befs_btree_find(), the only consumer of befs_find_key(),
doesn't use the value if the return is BEFS_BT_NOT_FOUND.
Tested the patch anyway to be sure.
Acked-by: Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@....samsung.com>
Pushed to the befs-next branch:
https://github.com/luisbg/linux-befs/tree/befs-next
Thanks!
Luis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists