[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <579F5232.401@osg.samsung.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 14:44:18 +0100
From: Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@....samsung.com>
To: Salah Triki <salah.triki@...il.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
CC: mhocko@...e.com, vdavydov@...tuozzo.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] fs: befs: remove useless initialization to zero
On 31/07/16 21:34, Salah Triki wrote:
> node_off is unconditionally set to bt_super.root_node_ptr, so no need to
> init it to zero.
>
> Signed-off-by: Salah Triki <salah.triki@...il.com>
> ---
> fs/befs/btree.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/befs/btree.c b/fs/befs/btree.c
> index f33fc6c..3cb97e8 100644
> --- a/fs/befs/btree.c
> +++ b/fs/befs/btree.c
> @@ -420,7 +420,7 @@ befs_btree_read(struct super_block *sb, const befs_data_stream *ds,
> {
> struct befs_btree_node *this_node;
> befs_btree_super bt_super;
> - befs_off_t node_off = 0;
> + befs_off_t node_off;
> int cur_key;
> fs64 *valarray;
> char *keystart;
>
Looks good to me.
Strange that static analysis didn't pick this one up before.
Acked-by: Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@....samsung.com>
Pushed to the befs-next branch:
https://github.com/luisbg/linux-befs/tree/befs-next
Thanks Salah,
Luis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists